½¿É«µ¼º½

is a cornerstone of research assessment in the UK, influencing funding, reputation and strategy across institutions. However, many researchers are still unsure of how it works, why it matters or what it means to be ‘REF-able’.

½¿É«µ¼º½ is excited to invite contributions to a new ½¿É«µ¼º½ Blog series that aims to shed light on the REF’s significance, the expectations it sets and how researchers can navigate and contribute to it effectively.

We invite research-informed contributions on topics such as:

The basics of REF:

• What is REF?
• Why does REF matter to researchers and institutions?
• What are the potential advantages and challenges REF brings?
• How can researchers align their work with REF criteria?

Examining the three REF pathways:

• Outputs
• • What distinguishes 1*, 2*, 3* and 4* outputs?
  • Exploring the criteria of significance, rigor and originalityÌýin assessing outputs
• Impact case studies
• • What makes for a compelling impact case study?
  • Examples of REF case studies that have driven change and/or benefited society
• People, culture and environment
• • How to foster a thriving research culture
  • What defines a ‘good’ research environment under REF standards?

Comparative systems:

• What do other countries do to achieve similar outcomes to REF?
• What are the pros and cons of the systems used by other countries, compared with REF?

Why contribute?Ìý

Publishing with the ½¿É«µ¼º½ Blog is a fantastic opportunity to share your insights with an engaged audience of educators, policymakers and researchers. As a contributor, you will help to guide colleagues in understanding and preparing for REF 2029, while raising awareness of critical issues in research excellence and impact.

How to contribute

If you have expertise or experiences to share on these REF topics, please refer to our blog submission policy and send your contribution to blog@bera.ac.uk.